Instead, it goes for thrills by repulsive images and disgusting cinematography. It has zero cinematic value and almost no artistic significance either.
Nekromantik 1987 horror movie#
However, this one here is really only a movie by the very basic definition of having moving pictures. The writer and director is JJörg Buttgereit and he was still in his early 20s when he made this movie, probably his most famous work. "Nekromantik" is a German movie from over 25, almost 30, years ago. On that level the film certainly works but Buttgereit also deserves some credit for the technical achievements in the picture. NEKROMANTIK has one main goal and that is to shock and make the viewer sick. I'd also add that the music score is just as creepy as anything you actually see in the movie. With all things considered, the two lead performances are good enough for this type of material and there's no question that they both look their parts just fine. This here adds a certain creepy element to the already sick material and at times it really does feel as if you're watching a real creep commit these crimes. The low-budget certainly shines through and there's no question you're watching something that was shot with little to no money. Is the film disgusting? Yes it is but at the same time I think it's quite well-made and if you can stomach the material then you're in for a rather good movie. Is NEKROMANTIK a good film? I would have to say yes, although there's no doubt that a movie like this would never get any credit because serious film critics or film buffs are going to puke before the ten-minute mark and just write the film off as trash. He has given countless interviews over the years and it's clear that his main goal was to go after the German censors and create something that would not only shock people but make them sick to their stomach and probably question anyone who would enjoy such brutality. Director Jorg Buttgereit wasn't trying to become the next Orson Welles when he made this film. That's what I reckon anyway.Nekromantik (1987) *** (out of 4) German horror film about a weird man (Bernd Daktari Lorenz) who supplies his even weirder girlfriend (Beatrice Manowski) with dead body parts, which eventually leads to one of the most bizarre sex scenes in cinema history. The fault lies with the concept, not Kenneth Anger. Interviews would have been far better, both for the Anger set and this DVD. I get the impression that the whole concept of the commentary track is rather alien to him (as it is to me) and only limits the imformation that he is able to give on the films. They would surely have more closely represented the way Anger is in person.
![nekromantik 1987 horror nekromantik 1987 horror](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/vyY4tOylyTI/hqdefault.jpg)
If they had just recorded video interviews with him it would have been a different story. I think he's also the kind of artist who likes to let films speak for themselves and therefore I think the idea of getting him to record commentary tracks was very unwise.
Nekromantik 1987 horror full#
Anyone who has heard Anger speak knows he is the sort of person who just says whatever comes into his head and is likely to go off on wild tangents at any moment, but his words are always entertaining and he is full of all kinds of information about film.
![nekromantik 1987 horror nekromantik 1987 horror](https://www.pophorror.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/nekrofeatured.jpg)
This simply limits him in what he is able to discuss. I think it was a bad move trying to get Anger to conform to this modern idea of dvd commentary tracks.
![nekromantik 1987 horror nekromantik 1987 horror](https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-viIzPaidZyg/XtzFE8UbxII/AAAAAAAA0xI/qeFh0Ruy3hgUAK8Y7wB8tyg8MAZ1fHBEACPcBGAsYHg/w500/t3WXB722PlRObBBsgjErjAgIuWn.jpg)
In my opinion the problem is not Kenneth Anger, I think the problem is the idea of the commentary track itself. Matt wrote:And I'll never again be suckered into buying something just because it has a Kenneth Anger commentary. Jean Genet Interview By Bertrand Poirot-Delpech, 1982 Genet Documentary By Antoine Bourseiller, 1981 Forbidden in France upon its release, and only available in the US in censored form and through underground distribution, UN CHANT D'AMOUR is now released from its obscurity and is presented in its complete version, with a new transfer.įeature Film With Commentary By Kenneth Anger Despite all elements of his writings being present, Genet actually denounced the making of this film when he became popular as a novelist. The story, set in a prison with three main characters, a guard and two prisoners, is a voyeuristic, confrontational, poetic masterpiece. Originally made for Parisian gay porn collectors in 1950, the film is visually reminiscent of Jean Cocteau's Blood of a Poet, Belle et la Bete and Kenneth Anger's Fireworks.
![nekromantik 1987 horror nekromantik 1987 horror](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51Mm5Yl09EL.jpg)
Cult Epics is proud to present Jean Genet's rarely seen semi-pornographic film UN CHANT D'AMOUR.